On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 11:28:44AM -0500, Wallace Matthews wrote:
> For any set of targets with identical tags, the highest valued index
> is the resulting value in that location in the table.
No, it's the lowest index because the loop is run in reverse:
for (i = s->count; i-- > 0; )
tag_table[targets[i].t] = i;
Thus, the loop that scans the targets with the j++ increment is handling
things correctly.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
