On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 02:40:29AM -0700, jw schultz wrote: > I see you have make the transition.
Yes! My simple speed tests I ran the other day showed that the code was a good bit faster than the default fnmatch on my system, and just barely faster than the lib/fnmatch.c routine we used to include with rsync, so I was satisfied that it wasn't going to cause anyone's rsync processing to bog down. > The only negative i have at this point is that i don't like the > indentation. The original wildmat code used a 4-character shiftwidth, and I just never changed it. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
