On Mon, Feb 03, 2003, jw schultz wrote: > Just how magic is the 1024? To what was bwlimit set? And > the MTU?
The 1024 is very magic, I just pulled it out of my hat and 'lo, it worked well enough so I didn't touch it. I've usually used bwlimits of 4-12 depending on the time of day (expected available bandwidth in the neighbourhood) and my other traffic. MTU is 1500, but I'm not certain if the cable modem splits packages into smaller pieces than that for forwarding. I suspect not, though. > You do bring up an interesting point. I could see > restricting the write to bwlimit/100. Sleeping much longer > than 100ms is a bit crude. Tying the maximum amount to write to bwlimit sounds like a workable, a bit more general idea. -- Mikko Rauhala - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - <URL:http://www.iki.fi/mjr/> Transhumanist - WTA member - <URL:http://www.transhumanism.org/> Singularitarian - SIAI supporter - <URL:http://www.singinst.org/>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
