On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:24:57PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2003, "Green, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think splitting the branches will also let us be a little more
> > experimental in the development branch, at least until we get near
> > the next release phase, because we'll always have the field release
> > in which to make crucial bug fixes available quickly.
>
> I agree that this would be a good approach if and only if there is
> energy to do lots of development in the head branch. What do you have
> in mind?
And if such development rendered the code sufficiently
unstable that we couldn't safely release a new version for
security patches, if needed.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
