On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:09:43PM -0600, you [Dave Dykstra] wrote: > > I think I'll go ahead and put in your patch with the modification of using > O_TEXT_STR as you suggest.
Thanks. > I think the risk is low. I think so, too. > I had been concerned that perhaps older CPPs might not be able to handle > that syntax, but I see other places in the rsync code that are depending > on it so I think it's OK. I think it is standard C, but OTOH looking at for example http://www.chris-lott.org/resources/cstyle/portableC.pdf reminds that not all ancient C preprocessors are compliant. But, with such ancient beast, I think a lot of other things would break, too. -- v -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
