On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:56:57PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> Any thoughts on whether this should go in? I can see arguments either
> way. It seems like we ought to think about whether it would be better
> to do it as part of a generalized --chmod or --chmod-backup facility.
I'm inclined to push for more flexibility with:
--post-process=<exec_pathname>
Runs <exec_pathname> on the receiver just before rsync exits.
<exec_pathname> is passed a list of fully-qualified pathnames on
stdin (one per line) that have been created, modified or deleted by
this rsync instance.
Dan's patch would therefore be reduced to the single script:
#!/bin/bash
xargs chmod u-s
This would also allow rsync users to post-process modified files in
whatever way they wish.
- Adrian
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
