On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 03:58:26PM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote: > I tried the same command using rsync 2.5.5 on a Solaris 7 machine and it > got around 860MB before I cancelled it. Is this one still a problem for > you? I was copying to an empty directory and using a different operating > system, but at least it rules out a widespread general problem. I haven't > seen anybody else reporting a similar problem. Perhaps it was a temporary > problem on rsync.kernel.org. >
So sorry for not following this up. The problem was complicated by tsocks 1.7 and the socks5 firewall (Aventail) used here. A few weeks ago we switched from socks5 to Cisco PIX. After I disabled tsocks everything Just Worked(tm). A best guess, it's an rsync + socks5 issue maybe. To many variables to tell and no way to replicate it. -- Regards, Scott Russell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE. T/L 441-9289 / External 919-543-9289 http://bzimage.raleigh.ibm.com/webcam -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
