On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:57:32PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > On 2 Apr 2002, Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:14:50AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > > > Are there any other patches you think really need to go into a 2.5.6 > > > before we proceed? > > > > The attached patch is important for "out of the box" compilation on > > Tru64 UNIX. The FreeBSD issue has been resolved. > > OK, thanks. > > Zoong Pham also posted a patch for Tru64 that does this, and also a > few other things. (This is patches/rsync_zoong_tru64.diff) > > - Apparently work around mknod's inability to create pipes or > sockets. Is that necessary? (i.e. does 2.5.5 not copy fifos on > Tru64?)
Dunno. Haven't tested. > - Define EAI_ values not defined by the system headers. After > seeing the mess in the RH5.2 header files I can sympathize, but > adding them in by hand will is just not going to work. Is there > something else we can do to get the system headers to either > provide all the values or none? > > At the least we need to test for each value that may be missing it > and provide it only if so. With only the patch I posted, builds fine on Tru64 UNIX 4.0D, 5.0A, 5.1. I think Zoong Pham has 5.1A which we don't have so cannot test. -- albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
