Hello, I am getting the following error:
| rsync: open connection using rsh conn /usr/bin/rsync --server --sender -v . "/home/andrewm/test-rsync/tree/*" | large_file2 | write failed on large_file2 : Success:06 | rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at receiver.c(271) | rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (201 bytes read so far) | rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(140) I have only just subscribed to this mailing list, so apologies if I have missed any discussion on this topic. A MHonArc conversion of rsync.mbox (from rsync.samba.org) suggests I have. The 'patch' that has been mentioned, does it relate to this? If so, has it been applied to the source available at: rsync.samba.org? Else, how can I get hold of it and apply it? FYI: | andrewm@massachusetts:~/test-rsync$ rsync --version | rsync version 2.5.2 protocol version 26 | Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others | <http://rsync.samba.org/> | Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, IPv6, | 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums rsync was installed from Debian's 'testing' packages, i.e. not from source. | andrewm@connecticut:~$ ls -ltr /home/andrewm/test-rsync/tree/ | total 1425384 | -rw-r--r-- 1 andrewm staff 80999190 Feb 25 16:56 large_file2 <snip> 18 files, all the same size, all ascii randomish text just for testing. The files I intend to transfer don't need to be hidden from prying eyes, but would I benefit from using `ssh' as a more resilient method of communication than `rsh'? Any comments appreciated. Regards Andrew McGregor -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
