On 25 Jun 2001, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Perhaps we need some kind of a config file setup like ssh uses? It
> > would be possible to specify a different shell/blocking combination as
> > the default, perhaps even based on hostname matching (again, like ssh
> > supports), and the user could specify their own overrides, as needed.
> > This would allow things like using rsh for local systems, and ssh for
> > remote ones.
By the way, of course you can use ssh aliases for hosts in rsync,
since it just passes the hostname through to ssh without examining it.
> I now think your patch should be accepted, but it will be up to Martin or
> Tridge to put it in.
If you don't object then I think we will put it in.
--
Martin
VA Linux Systems GnuPG encrypted email preferred
