Neil Schellenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> >> (e.g. I seem to remember Dave Dykstra mentioning that certain
> >> server errors were not logged to the client for security
> >> reasons - I may have busted that, sorry).
>
> Dave> Martin & Tridge will need to decide about that patch. I
> Dave> think Tridge will probably not want all the messages sent to
> Dave> the client of a daemon.
>
> Sounds totally reasonable to me. Let me know if I can be of any help.
I'd like to suggest either a compile-time flag or a run-time flag to
enable debug messages when desired (off by default), as I really hate
it when you have to go re-instrument someones code (especially if
you have to do it more than once!) while debugging something else...
Anyway - I vote for the above kinda thing (not that this is a democracy
or anything, but hey, it makes me feel good ;-)
rc
Rusty Carruth Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: (480) 345-3621 SnailMail: Schlumberger ATE
FAX: (480) 345-8793 7855 S. River Parkway, Suite 116
Ham: N7IKQ @ 146.82+,pl 162.2 Tempe, AZ 85284-1825
ICBM: 33 20' 44"N 111 53' 47"W
