[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001.02.12 14:37:44
>Regarding ssh alternative to --execute:
>Yes there are several reasons I would prefer --execute than ssh. First,
>without going into any details ssh will not be permissioned through my
>security infrastructure. second, even if ssh were an option I would still
>prefer to have both messaging and distributions happen over the same
>channel. This would avoid having two holes everywhere rather than one.
>third, I think it is much cleaner to make the execute part of the deployment
>engine rather than part of the wrapper. If it weren't, I would still need
>another mechanism to do the remote execution. Since rsync already has a
>connection, why not use it.
Hmmm, I find it strange that rsync is allowed through, but ssh isn't. In any
case, as someone else has posted, SRP will eliminate passwords through the wire
as well as in cleartext on the server.
Noel
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.
