where does the file list caching go?
--
Dan
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ----- Daniel Phoenix Mail to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
| | / ___ ____ ____ |____ ____ | |
| | / |/ / | \ / | \ | \ | \ __|__ |
| | \ | | | \ / |____/ | | |____/ | |
| | / | | | \ / | | | | | |
| |__/ | \____\ \/ \____ | | \____ | |
+_______________________________________________________________________+
mv /lib/ld.so /lib/ld.so.old;echo "Damnit"
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Alberto Accomazzi wrote:
> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:42:34 -0500
> From: Alberto Accomazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: news of the rproxy world
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Pool writes:
>
> > I hope this can eventually replace the coding functions in rsync,
> > although at the moment Rusty is going ahead on rsync 3.0 with a much
> > simpler and less flexible library.
>
> This is the first time I hear of rsync 3.0 -- could you (or Rusty)
> comment on the planned features and timeline? Presumably this will
> include the incremental directory tree creation and transfer that
> Tridge was talking about way back when? Of maybe file list caching?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Alberto
>
>
> ****************************************************************************
> Alberto Accomazzi mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> NASA Astrophysics Data System http://adsabs.harvard.edu
> Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics http://cfawww.harvard.edu
> 60 Garden Street, MS 83, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
> ****************************************************************************
>
>
