I am going to ask again.......digest version of this list exist or not?






---
Dan


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
| -----     Daniel Phoenix      Mail to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]            |   | 
| |   /     ___    ____               ____    |____      ____       |   |     
| |  /    |/      /    |  \      /   |    \   |    \    |    \    __|__ |
| |  \    |      |     |   \    /    |____/   |     |   |____/      |   |
| |   /   |      |     |    \  /     |        |     |   |           |   |
| |__/    |       \____\     \/       \____   |     |    \____      |   |
+_______________________________________________________________________+
        mv /lib/ld.so /lib/ld.so.old;echo "Damnit"










---
Dan


+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
| -----     Daniel Phoenix      Mail to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]            |   | 
| |   /     ___    ____               ____    |____      ____       |   |     
| |  /    |/      /    |  \      /   |    \   |    \    |    \    __|__ |
| |  \    |      |     |   \    /    |____/   |     |   |____/      |   |
| |   /   |      |     |    \  /     |        |     |   |           |   |
| |__/    |       \____\     \/       \____   |     |    \____      |   |
+_______________________________________________________________________+
        mv /lib/ld.so /lib/ld.so.old;echo "Damnit"

On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Martin Pool wrote:

> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:30:22 +1100
> From: Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: why are things copying?
> 
> On 30 Oct 2000, "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > My arguments to rsync were causing the remote tree to be
> > reconstructed one level down from where I wanted it to go, which
> > obviously caused all the files to be sent over.
> 
> This is a little confusing, though it's necessary that we allow people
> to choose either behaviour.
> 
> > I still feel rsync could stand some improvement in its verbose output
> > levels; this makes two things I'd like to see:
> > 
> >  1) A line specifying _why_ each file was eligible for update (modtime,
> >     uid/gid change, whatever).
> > 
> >  2) Output showing the fully-qualified source *and* destination
> >     pathnames, so it's easy to see when rsync is going to put a
> >     directory hierarchy where you don't expect it.
> 
> They're both good ideas.  I just added explanations of exclusions, and
> I think these two will also be straightforward.
> 
> > Anyway, after fixing this rsync -n was able to determine that only
> > 20-odd files needed to be updated on my 2.7G filesystem in only 5
> > minutes!
> 
> Good to hear!
> 
> -- 
> Martin Pool, Linuxcare, Inc.
> +61 2 6262 8990
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com/
> Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
> 


Reply via email to