On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:52 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Robert Dober wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I am puzzled about the rspec tests that are generated by Rails3 >> scaffolding. I am however not sure if this is the correct place to >> discuss this issue. >> It might be that a rails ML/chat is better suited for that kind of >> discussion. It just depends on who is responsible for that code. >> Somehow I am too stupid to find that out, so please bare with me if I >> produced only noise here. > > When you run the scaffold generator, rspec-rails is responsible to generate > the specs. So this is the right place.
It is terrible how biased one can be, by learning it comes from you I looked at the code with new confidence and pretty much seem to understand it now. Sorry for the noise and thank you Cheers Robert > > Cheers, > David > >> Cheers >> Robert > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- The 1,000,000th fibonacci number contains '42' 2039 times; that is almost 30 occurrences more than expected (208988 digits). N.B. The 42nd fibonacci number does not contain '1000000' that is almost the expected 3.0e-06 times. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
