Agreed. I switched to github when I realized there was a delay posting here... These came in through after that.
On Nov 8, 11:24 am, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let's stick w/ the github issue. No need to do this on two paths. > > Thx > > On Nov 8, 2010, at 11:26 AM, lardawge wrote: > > > > > > > I created a sample app that this was repeatable in and would be happy > > to put it up on github... here is the gist of it: > > >https://gist.github.com/667961 > > > On Nov 7, 5:56 am, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:15 PM, lardawge wrote: > > >>> I am transitioning a Rails 2 app to Rails 3, Rspec 2 and have several > >>> controller where I test collect.should > >>> be_an_instance_of(WillPaginate::Collection). The spec fails with > >>> "expected [object] to be an instance of WillPaginate::Collection". The > >>> class of the object in the controller is WillPaginate::Collection. > >>> What am I missing? Why is assigns not returning the actual object? > >>> Controller collection class is WillPaginate::Collection. Spec > >>> collection class is an Array. > > >> Please post the failing example and the full failure message (i.e. run > >> with --backtrace so we can see the full backtrace). > > >>> Thanks, > >>> ~Larry > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> rspec-users mailing list > >> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-us...@rubyforge.org > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
