On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <
lboc...@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> I was thinking that it would be great to add 2 additional methods to
> Object: should_all and should_none.
>
> The idea is that we would be able to write tests like:
>
> [...@admin, @allowed_user].should_all be_allowed_to_visit(url)
>
> [...@unprivileged, @non_welcome].should_none be_allowed_to_visit(url)
>
> Implementation is trivial, but I think that tests would become much cleaner
> than:
>
> [...@admin, @allowed_user].each{|u| u.should be_allowed_to_visit(url)}
>
> Any thoughts on that?
>
How about:
each_of(@admin, @allowed_user).should be_allowed_to_visit(url)
none_of(@admin, @allowed_user).should be_allowed_to_visit(url)
This gets the cleanliness without adding to Object.
WDYT?
David
> Rodrigo.
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
