Afaik, != is one of the few operators that is intrinsic. I believe
there is no !=() method defined in Ruby.
Hunted and pecked from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Willy Mene <wm...@stanford.edu> wrote:
Yes, I do know about .should_not, and the example should be written
that way. So the following
[].should_not == []
'string'.should_not == 'string'
do fail. But I'm trying to understand why they pass with .should !=
Willy
On Oct 12, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Lee Hambley wrote:
Willy...
Should you not use .should_not ?
-- Lee
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
