On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Nicholas Van Weerdenburg <vanwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking around outside of the book, reading reviews of RSpec on the web > seems tricky. Most reviews seem very dated, and as a result are misleading. > Is this an accurate assessment?
I don't think so. The core syntax and sensibilities of RSpec haven't changed in any disruptive way. It's added new features, like those contexts and such, but there's no compulsion to use them. And to me they don't have much impact on the fundamental _flavor_ of RSpec. The only part of any old RSpec lore that's truly obsolete now is the story runner. Substitute "Cucumber" wherever you read "RSpec Story Runner" and substitute "beautiful" wherever you read "it's a pain." Otherwise the progress is all pretty much evolutionary, not revolutionary. -- Have Fun, Steve Eley (sfe...@gmail.com) ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine http://www.escapepod.org _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
