I wasn't thinking about a gun. I was just wondering if there is some underlying reason that I'm missing. Is there a background structure that I'm not grasping? Is there a huge piece of functionality that I'm missing? Is it faster than Test:Unit or Shoulda?
Amos(adkron) On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:01 AM, doug livesey <biot...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it's that RSpec encodes some of the latest BDD into its way of > thinking. > It has a vocabulary that encourages that, so in a way, yes, it's all about > semantics. > Semantics that encourage agile thinking & practice. > Also, it allows you to structure your specs (that become your regression > tests) in a much more intuitive way than Test::Unit -- I don't know Shoulda. > But if I understood all the pros & cons of two systems & preferred another, > I'd use that -- there's no gun against anyone's head. ;) > Doug. > > 2009/4/22 Saturn <saturn.st...@gmail.com> >> >> I am also having same question that i can't find the reason why i >> should go for RSpec instead of Test/Unit. >> There is no compelling reason / advantage offered by RSpec except >> semantics. >> >> >> Is RSpec all about different syntax??????? >> >> Thanks in advance for clarifying it??? >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- Amos King http://dirtyInformation.com http://github.com/Adkron -- Looking for something to do? Visit http://ImThere.com _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
