Hi, Yes that's great! That works perfectly.
I'd appreciate it if you could let me know about the be_html_with issue when you can though, as I like the natural language better. Thank you very much. Brandon > -----Original Message----- > From: rspec-users-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:rspec-users- > boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Phlip > Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 1:46 PM > To: rspec-users@rubyforge.org > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Phlip's be_html_with was RE: Problem with > Custom matcher and Blocks > > Brandon Olivares wrote: > > > it "should have a name field" do > > response.body.should be_html_with { > > form.contact! do > > label 'Name' > > input.name! > > end > > } > > end # it "should have a name field" > > > > There is most definitely not a name field, nor its associated label. > > Can you try the assert_xhtml version? I think it will drop in with: > > Spec::Runner.configure do |c| > c.include Test::Unit::Assertions > end > > be_html_with{} is something of a nail-soup issue for me because we > always only > use test/unit at my day job... sorry! > > I will look at the issue this weekend - the @failure_message might not > bubble up > to the RSpec wrapper correctly... > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
