just upgraded to 1.2.0
the following code works now:
template.stub!(:render).with(hash_including(:partial => "children/
child"))
template.should_receive(:render).with(hash_including(:partial =>
"children/child"))
The only question that is left for me is about Nick's words:
"If you set a method expectation on an object (IE:
template.should_receive(:render) ), you don't need to stub the method
(IE: template.stub!(:render) isn't needed)."
Basically, there are two situation.
1) I want to check if a function was called and I want to execute the
function code
2) I want to check if a function was called and I don't want to
execute the function code so I used stubbing.
I thought that for the first scenario the solution would be:
template.should_receive(:render) #only checks if render function was
called
and for the second scenario
template.stub!(:render) #stub render function
template.should_receive(:render) #check if render function was called
Am I right?
Thanks,
Evgeny
On Mar 18, 11:23 pm, Zach Dennis <zach.den...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Evgeny Bogdanov
>
>
>
> <evgeny.bogda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have a problem similar to one mentioned in this post.
> > I call a partial inside another partial.
> > _mother.haml contains:
> > render :partial => "children/child"
>
> > In mother_spec.rb file I am trying to stub the render call.
> > Here is a working version:
> > =============
> > template.should_receive(:render)
> > template.stub!(:render)
>
> > render :partial => 'mother'
> > ============
> > I would prefer to specify that the partial I am stubbing is "children/
> > child",
> > however the following code doesn't work for me:
> > ===========
> > template.stub!(:render).with(hash_including(:partial => 'children/
> > child'))
> > template.expect_render(:partial => 'children/child')
>
> What version of rspec are you using? #expect_render has been removed
> in rspec 1.2 and has been deprecated for a while before that so you
> won't want to rely on that unless you're using an old version of
> rspec.
>
>
>
> > render :partial => 'mother'
>
> > : Mock 'render_proxy' expected :render with ({:partial=>"children/
> > child"}) once, but received it 0 times
> > ===========
> > Is it possible to stub the render call with specific partial name?
>
> You had it right, hash including should work:
> template.stub!(:render).with(hash_including(:partial => "children/child"))
>
> To stub all partials being rendered:
> template.stub!(:render).with(hash_including(:partial => anything))
>
> HTH,
>
>
>
>
>
> > Thank you in advance,
> > Evgeny
>
> > On Jan 20, 5:35 pm, Bart Zonneveld <zuperinfin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 20-jan-2009, at 15:29, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> >> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Bart Zonneveld
> >> > <zuperinfin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Hey list,
>
> >> >> As a good BDDer I want to test my views in isolation.
>
> >> > Sort of. A *good* BDDer wants to *specify* views in isolation. Testing
> >> > is for testers :)
>
> >> You're right! I tend to talk a lot to non-programmers, and they get
> >> that glaze-in-the-distance look in their eyes, whenever I mention
> >> specifiy, spec'ing, or what have you :).
>
> >> >> And as a good rails
> >> >> programmer, I separate views into partials when needed. So, when
> >> >> testing my
> >> >> views, I want tostubout rendering of partials in my views. I'm
> >> >> working on
> >> >> upgrading an app from rails 2.1.2 to 2.2.2, using the latest rspec
> >> >> and
> >> >> rspec-rails.
>
> >> >> I used to throw template.stub!(:render) in a before(:each) block
> >> >> and be done
> >> >> with it
>
> >> > That sounds kinda risky because you could be ignoring partials that
> >> > get rendered that you don't want to be rendered.
>
> >> It is, most definately.
>
> >> >> , but that doesn't work anymore. I can understand why, but now I have
> >> >> to do something like template.stub!(:render).with(hash_including
> >> >> (:partial =>
> >> >> anything)). Except for when I'm testing a partial, then I need to
> >> >> replace
> >> >> the anything with every partial I'm rendering in my partial.
>
> >> >> Is this the correct way,
>
> >> > Seems like the only way at the moment. Wouldn't call it correct or
> >> > incorrect.
>
> >> I would call it ugly :). Not only do I have to remember the
> >> hash_including part, but also the anything (and not :anything).
> >> Conceptually, I like the template.stub!(:render). Irendera
> >> template, on which Istuball the renders. Whether that's risky or
> >> not is a different discussion.
>
> >> >> or is there perhaps something like
> >> >> template.stub_partials :only => [], :except => [] ?
>
> >> > Nothing like this exists. Seems like a reasonable idea. Feel free to
> >> > submit a feature request, or better yet, a patch to
> >> >http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com
>
> >> Will do!
>
> >> cheers,
> >> bartz
>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rspec-users mailing list
> >> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us...@rubyforge.org
> >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> --
> Zach Dennishttp://www.continuousthinking.comhttp://www.mutuallyhuman.com
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
