On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Pat Nakajima <patnakaj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Has anyone tried this? is it useful? > > It looks interesting, though it could be confused for trying to exactly > mimic the actual markup, not just specify interesting parts.
What is the method name was be_html_including instead of be_html_with??? > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> http://gist.github.com/76136 >> >>> response.body.should be_html_with{ >>> form :action => '/users' do >>> fieldset do >>> legend 'Personal Information' >>> label 'First name' >>> input :type => 'text', :name => 'user[first_name]' >>> end >>> end >>> } >> >> Has anyone tried this? is it useful? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
