David Chelimsky wrote: > > No, no, no :) > > 5.should == 5 > 6.should be > 5 > > Read them aloud and they.should make(:sense). > > Cheers, > David
Perhaps it is my dialect, but what is wrong with: "5 should be equal to 5" which generally is how I read "=="? Actually, I tend to read "==" (in Ruby) as "is equal to". -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
