On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Tero Tilus <t...@tilus.net> wrote: > 2009-02-12 15:42, Pat Maddox: >>> The fact that you are asking this shows that we're violating the >>> principle of least surprise. >> >> Yes it's a surprise > > How do you know #errors_on not implicitly validating wouldn't be > bigger surprise? Say 30 (instead of three now surprised) people would > be surprised.
Well, I don't know. If you've used Rails for a while you know that AR objects don't have errors attached to them until valid? is called. Anyway, I think overall the implicit valid? is a good thing. Pat _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
