David Chelimsky wrote: > > I explained my position in another post in this thread, and I look > forward to your *respectful* responses to those thoughts.
I regret if my initial observation was taken as anything other than that, an observation. One might consider it the textual equivalent to a raised eyebrow, no more. Being told to maintain my own fork of a project was not a response that I either expected or thought warranted. Notwithstanding the heat that this issue appears to have raised, I assure you that I bear no ill will towards any. I simply believe that changes which introduce breakage to previously working code should be avoided wherever possible. This did not seem to me condescending, abrasive, or particularly controversial. Evidently I am wrong. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
