On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Nick Hoffman <n...@deadorange.com> wrote: > On 07/02/2009, at 1:16 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Nick Hoffman <n...@deadorange.com> wrote: >>> >>> When writing Cucumber stories and features for controllers, should you >>> cover >>> every edge case? For example, should you write stories that feed bad or >>> missing data to your controllers, or should that be left to RSpec? >> >> Depends on the team and who can read what and who cares about what. >> >> In most cases, Cucumber is a significantly better >> developer/stakeholder collaboration tool than RSpec is. If your >> stakeholders trust you to cover the edge cases, then they don't need >> to be in cucumber, but they certainly can be. >> >> IASTDH, >> David > > Makes sense. Thanks for the clarification. > > By the way, what on Earth is IASTDH? A few Google searches later, I'm still > none the wiser.
I made it up. I was about to write HTH, but I was sure it did not help, hence IASTDH - inconsistent though - IA for I am, but D for didn't, so it should either be ISTDH or IASTDNH. HTH, David > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
