On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:52 PM, MarkMT <mark.thom...@ieee.org> wrote: > This is really a webrat question, but I haven't had any reaction to > this from the webrat group. Maybe someone here can offer a comment... > > I've been fooling around with webrat view matchers in merb / cucumber > and I'm trying to figure out whether the block parameter in have_tag > actually does anything. I've tried passing a block with pure nonsense > in it and the interpreter just seems to accept it and ignore it as if > it doesn't exist. > > Initially I had hoped there was something like 'with_tag' you could > nest inside a block, but I guess that was a rails thing. However from > my quick look at the code, although with fairly limited ruby > experience, I got the impression that 'have_tag' passes any matching > markup it finds into the block as a parameter. But none of my > experiments have been able to confirm this. > > Does anyone have first hand knowledge of / successful experience with > have_tag with a block?
Not first hand experience, but I'm looking at the specs in webrat: http://github.com/brynary/webrat/blob/e5ae16367cfd656617815fd9b9c405bc6bb3a97d/spec/public/matchers_spec.rb If you scroll down to describe "#have_tag", you'll see a couple of examples. It looks like your instinct is at least close to correct. Can you post an example of what you're trying to do? > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
