Fernando Perez wrote: >> My own experience is quite limited, [...] > > Hi James, are you saying that you only use Cucumber and not RSpec at > all?
No, I do use RSpec and TestUnit for that matter, but not to any extent at the present time. I find that cucumber features are much more conducive to driving out the design than RSpec expectations. Once the essence of the application is laid out and working then, if necessary, I will consider adding more technical type expectations via RSpec. Frankly, at the moment, I do not see a compelling case to move from step definitions into formal RSpec expectations. Again, my experience in these matters is limited and perhaps as it grows my appreciations will change as well. I do note however, that once one finds a tool that suits ones needs then it is somewhat inefficient to use another without some compelling advantage to be gained. What advantage does formal RSpec constructions provide over cucumber step definitions using RSpec and RSpec-Rails methods? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
