Comments below 2009/1/19 Joseph Wilk <li...@ruby-forum.com>
> Andrew Premdas wrote: > > You misunderstood I bit of my post, I've nested a comment. Its towards > > the > > end of the post. > > > > 2009/1/18 Joseph Wilk <j...@josephwilk.net> > > > >> Scenario Outline: viewing resources # > >> features/admin/poop.feature:11 > >> > >> -- > >> features/step_definitions/general.rb:1 > >> When I follow <resource> resource # > >> |product | > >> > http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/16211-cucumber/tickets/163-hidden-pending-status-with-output-when-using-scenario-outlines > >> And there are 4 <resource> > >> > >> > >> keen on this solution as I would like to preserve the way the scenarios > are > >> defined (in the feature file) with the way that they are outputted. > >> > >> > >> > >> And there are 4 category # > >> features/admin/poop.feature:8 > >> And there are 4 product # > >> features/step_definitions/product.rb:1 > >> > > > > No you've misunderstood me. I meant the outline step is colored with the > > worst result. Then the details of each run of the step are nested inside > > the > > outline step showing the output for each resource (entry in the table) > > Would you expect to still see the scenario table with status colours? > Yes it feels that the table would still be useful in this situation to guide you back to the nested output to look for things > Do you think it might become difficult to workout which steps are for > which run? > i.e the 5th indented Step broke so lets read through and find each 5th > step to see what the run did. > Hopefully because the nested output contains the expanded template variable the navigation will be OK. The idea was that the nesting would only happen when there was variation i.e. a different matcher in the first example or a different result in the second. If you showed the nesting for every step regardless then yes I think things could get pretty confusing. I haven't really thought about what happens with errors yet. For example if you have five things in your table and they all fail generating a massive output stack. Would you really want to see five output stacks? > It does sound like an interesting idea. Would you mind adding the full > output you would expect with this indentation in the ticket please? (If > you want colour as a html attachment). > I will do this, but let me think about it a little more > > Thanks, > Your welcome > -- > Joseph Wilk > http://blog.josephwilk.net > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
