Nicholas Wieland wrote: > Does someone have an example on faking a file upload for just ensuring > it gets called, without actually uploading the file to s3. > I thought that stubbing Model.has_attached_file would be enough, but > it doesn't seem so ... > > This is what I did: > > Video.stub!( :has_attached_file ).with( :name ).and_return( true ) > > has_attached_file is from paperclip, it gets mixed to the model. > > 1) > RightAws::AwsError in 'VideosController should create a valid Video' > AWS access keys are required to operate on S3 > /Users/ngw/zooppa-4/app/controllers/videos_controller.rb:6:in `create' > /Users/ngw/zooppa-4/spec/controllers/videos_controller_spec.rb:17: > > Maybe I missed something ? > > TIA, > ngw
I am struggling with Webrat and Paperclip. If I specify: validates_attachment_presence :image, then AR complains because there is no image set. Therefore I decide to remove this validation, and instead use: validates_presence_of :image_file_name, to trick him. But it still doesn't work. When I create a new object, even if I put: Product.create!(..., :image_file_name => 'thumb1.png'), AR still complains and it says that Image file name is missing. There must be some Paperclip magic which I can't get around. The only solution I have found is to remove the validation of the attachment for passing the tests, but I'd like to keep it. Anyone ran into this previously? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
