Thank you for clarifying. Yes, I mean edge rails.
Best, M On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:01 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Mischa Fierer <f.mis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Wanted to point out to anyone having problems that rspec-rails 1.1.11.1 > > works with rails 2.3, while rspec 1.1.11 does not appear to. > > $ gem q -rn rails > ... > rails (2.2.2) > ... > > Doesn't look like rails-2.3 is released. Do you mean edge rails? > > Also - just so we're all clear, any gem w/ a 4th part (like 1.1.11.1) > is an interim, unofficial release that I make available at github as a > convenience (http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/wikis/releases-and-gems). > They get prefixed w/ my github username, so: > > $ gem q -rn dchelimsky-rspec > dchelimsky-rspec (1.1.11.1) > dchelimsky-rspec-rails (1.1.11.1) > > I just pushed updated gemspecs, so there should be a pair of 1.1.11.2 > gems up there soon (usually takes 15 to 30 minutes before they show > up) that won't require you futzing with the manifest. > > Cheers, > David > > > > > Also, to get rspec 1.1.11.1 to build I had to remove UPDATE from the > > manifest. > > > > M > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
