Matt Wynne wrote: > > Make sense? > Matt
Yes. I am afraid that my original post is based upon a naive sense of how things work in this environment. Clearly, whenever one is dealing with human input then the possibility of incomplete, contradictory, or simply wrong data must be accommodated as elegantly as is possible. I was overmuch concerned with testing at that moment to give the other issues their due. I have since run across the construct shown below and have used it in the functional test rather than changing the controller code for testing. # This code extends the subject controller to # display errors raised in the controller code # in the test results require 'clients_controller' class ClientsController; def rescue_action(e) raise e end; end # back to our test -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
