On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Mike Gunderloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 4, 2008, at 10:24 AM, Luis Lavena wrote: > >> Neither Rails was the one with best documentation (which btw I wonder >> what happened with the caboose documentation project they collected >> 12K, anyway). > > Tangential to this discussion, but anyhow: some of that money is going into > the Rails Guides hackfest right now. Rails docs can always use improvement > (as can RSpec's - and I say that as a committed RSpec user who is still > confused too much of the time), but we're making progress, I think. >
Actually I didn't know about it, sometimes lot of that stuff get lost between links. We are all still confused with RSpec, is hard when you need to jump from Test::Unit, NUnit and other testing frameworks back and forth (at least for me). What about something like the merb book? I know David cannot participate on it, but others can and we should bring the basic and advance techniques from blog posts and the mailing list to that document. -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. Douglas Adams _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
