On Oct 30, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Sebastian W. wrote:
No idea why you couldn't pass a flag for regression testing:
mock(Foo, :check_methods => true)
Scott
It seems to me this way, too - though I'm obviously biased. :)
It's true that a lot of the dynamic stuff could be problematic -
what if
the flag was only for checking methods directly implemented on that
class? Though I guess that'd lead down a potential dark path where
you'd
then also want the "mock" method to potentially check all mixins and
validate, etc. etc.
On the other hand, maybe it could serve as a gentle remonstrance to
folks to not overdo it with the "i am an 3l337 ninj4 haxx0r"
metaprogramming? Just a thought.
+1
Tests *are* supposed to influence the way we write production code.
Scott
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
