On Oct 17, 2008, at 10:41 am, Matt Wynne wrote:
I'm also interested in this, as we're currently deciding which route
to go.
I like the philosophy behind screw unit - it feels like the team
want to give us RSpec for javascript.
That's the feeling I got, that SU is trying to be a cleaner, slicker
implementation of JSSpec. I saw someone try JSSpec a few months back
and very quickly hit issues with message expectations. As for whether
it's "JSSpec on crack*" I will have to try it to see...
One of the things that has irritated me (and generally does with
javascript unit testing) is that running the tests is quite slow and
requires selenium. I did a little spike to run them via celerity
instead:
http://gist.github.com/15273
Awesome! I'll have to try that when I get into JS.
Thanks
Ashley
* Or Akuz if you're in the UK
--
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://aviewfromafar.net/
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
