Have you thought about building a fake object instead of using
mocking / stubbing? It might be simpler, and you can use Pat's
ServiceLocator idea to substitute your fake for the cucumber runs.
On 30 Sep 2008, at 15:55, Luke Melia wrote:
On Sep 15, 2008, at 4:35 PM, Pat Maddox wrote:
I don't think you're really supposed to mock or stub when using
cucumber.
We need to stub time in some of our scenarios, which exist to to
verify behavior over time. We're looking into a before/after to
support mocking/stubbing for this scenario.
Cheers,
Luke
--
Luke Melia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.lukemelia.com/
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
