El 26/9/2008, a las 13:30, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Sep 25, 2008, at 9:50 pm, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
The following trick, calling "pending" from inside the before block,
effectively does what I want. But I'm wondering if I can count on
this behaviour going forward? What do you think?
describe 'Something' do
before do
if required_tools_not_installed
pending 'not running on this platform'
end
end
it 'should do something' do
1.should == 1
end
end
Hi Wincent
How about wrapping it this way instead...
describe 'Something' do
if required_tools_installed
it 'should do something' do
1.should == 1
end
end
end
That will make them invisible (for better or worse).
Yeah, that's another way of doing it.
How come you need this? Is what you really need to spec that the tool
itself degrades gracefully? eg
describe 'Something' do
if required_tools_installed
it 'should do something' do
1.should == 1
end
else
it 'should inform the user the tool is missing'
end
end
No, it's actually a case of having a bunch of Java junk installed on
my local system which I can use to do extended testing of things like
feed validity on this machine, while on the server I don't have (and
can't install) the Java stuff so would like to skip those specs.
Cheers,
Wincent
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
