On Sep 5, 2008, at 3:11 PM, Matt Wynne wrote:
On 5 Sep 2008, at 19:14, Jonathan Linowes wrote:
it just seems to me that while i'm running my tests on toy data
sets, it could be reassuring to see the same run on real production
data. Or, maybe not.
I agree its not real scientific, but neither is the weather... :)
(aka, shit happens)
Can you give us a concrete example of something that you're worried
might go wrong?
Well, actually linoj ran into one regarding gems installed on the
production box. For some reason ruby2ruby was being required, which
redefines method_missing on nil to return nil - meaning that if a
method on nil got called, he wouldn't see it - more then likely, a
template would just display "nil" instead of raising an error.
Scott
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
