Consider: should_have_the_same_members_as -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zach Dennis Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 11:15 AM To: rspec-users Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Someone please name this matcher for me
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've had a matcher in my head for a couple months, that I frequently > want but never get around to writing because I can't think of the name > for it. Here's how it would look > > [1, 2, 3, 4, 1].should ... [1, 3, 1, 4, 2] > > I have a couple ideas for names, but I'll hold off on them so I don't > influence anyone's opinion. > > btw, I realize that .sort works in this case. But that's slightly > less clear than I'd like, and it doesn't work for non-Comparable > objects (like activerecords). [1, 2, 3, 4, 1].should consist_of([1, 3, 1, 4, 2]) Since consist means "to be composed or made up of", which matches the usage. To me it reads like, this thing should be made up of these other things. WDYT? -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com http://www.mutuallyhuman.com _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
