On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:58 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 23, 2008, at 2:54 PM, Pat Maddox wrote: > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Mark Dodwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the comments. >>> >>> This might be more obvious, but what about rails integration tests -- >>> presumably RSpec stories make these redundant for sure? >> >> Yeah, stories can serve the same role as integration tests. > > Funny - I always looked at it the other way around - treating rails > integration tests as something close to stories. > >> >> >> Pat >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
I think that Rails integration tests are very effective integration tests. Although you can make them quite expressive, I still wouldn't show them to a customer. User stories *can* serve that same role, though doing so misses the key benefits. Pat _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
