+2.74 On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 12:49 -0400, Corey Haines wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Ashley Moran > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27/03/2008, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not likely. Not because it isn't awesome. I'll > probably be using it > myself. But every good idea for a matcher library > doesn't belong in > rspec. In fact, the whole point of creating such a > simple protocol for > matchers was to encourage external libraries. > > I think it's fine just as it is. > > > In that case, would a central repository of re-usable matchers > be a good idea? (Maybe just a page on rspec.info?) > > > Ashley > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > -- > http://www.coreyhaines.com > The Internet's Premiere source of information about Corey Haines > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users -- Jonathan Leighton http://jonathanleighton.com/
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
