On Mar 5, 2008, at 2:57 PM, "Rick DeNatale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:31 PM, David Chelimsky > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mar 5, 2008, at 11:43 AM, "Rick DeNatale" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> wrote: >>>> I'm wanting to write a spec that a model is applying an :order >>>> option >>>> to a find call, but I don't want to completely specify all of the >>>> find >>>> parameters. >>>> >>>> So I want to write something like this, say in a controller spec >>>> >>>> User.should_receive(:find).with(:all, hash_with_at_least(:order => >>>> 'user.name ASC')) >>>> get 'index', :sort => 'up' >> >> I really like this idea. What about something more general that can >> handle the first n args too? > > That's a horse of a different color I think. It would need to dig > into MessageExpectation#with and/or the way ArgumentExpectations are > built. > > Dealing with it an argument at a time is easy since it just needs == > to 'do the right thing' on an argument 'proxy'. Agreed. I think hash_with would be clear enough and a bit more terse. Agree? > > > -- > Rick DeNatale > > My blog on Ruby > http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
