On 10/4/07, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > shipping_type.should be_include(Cart::SHIPPING_TYPE_REGULAR)
This is what I usually do; I agree the syntax of be_include looks odd, as is true for some other predicates. OTOH, it's hard to find a formulation that works well for all predicates. For instance: domain.should_valid doesn't look as good as domain.should be_valid domain.should_include(x) looks better than domain.should be_include(x) Rspec could support both, which means you could select the one that "looks" right, I guess. That might lead to inconsistent usage. I can live with the current approach as well, looks odd, but it's not a serious problem for me. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
