Ok, thanks Simons, :). On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Alex van den Bogaerdt < a...@vandenbogaerdt.nl> wrote:
> > Hmmm Alex, got it. > > you're responding to Simon's reply. Just to make that clear. > > > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:600 > > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:6:700 > > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:24:775 > > RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:288:797 > > RRA:MAX:0.5:1:600 > > RRA:MAX:0.5:6:700 > > RRA:MAX:0.5:24:775 > > RRA:MAX:0.5:444:797 > > > > > > and my datasources are: > > > > DS:in:COUNTER:600:U:U > > DS:out:COUNTER:600:U:U > > default step size of 300 seconds? > > If RRDtool does what it promises, you could set the end time to some time > n*300s, and set the start time to "end-300s". That should give you one > stores rate out of the RRA with each CDP is 1 PDP. > > Simon wrote: > >> What I'm trying to say is that the graph may be showing the average for > >> the previous 5 minute period, while fetch is showing you the average for > >> the previous 30 minutes. > > don't know how accurate RRDtool is nowadays but there was a time when > start and/or end times were "massaged" to some other number than one would > expect. When discussed as such, the response was more "don't care" than > "will fix", and that's when I lost my passion. > > Different versions had (have?) different problems, so whoever is trying > similar things should be prepared to closely look what *exactly* is > happening, as opposed to how it *should* behave (read: is documented). > > > -- - Arch Linux - Usuário Linux #470599. LPI ID: LPI000187143 - Desenvolvedor Java/Python/Web - +55 (88) 9713-7657 - Bacharel em Sistemas de Informação pela Estácio ( http://www.estacio.br/ ) - Irc: lokidarkeden at freenode.com - http://www.leandrocosta.pro.br
_______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
