----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Elias" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 3:49 PM Subject: [rrd-users] RRD Graphs with bad averaging of missing data?
> Year;Mon;Day:Hour;Min;Sec:Bin;Sensor;Value:Bin;Sensor;Value:etc > 2014;04;05:09;55;03:120;1;331:120;2;205:120;3;360:120;4;297:120;5;431:120;6;1306 > 2014;04;05:09;55;07:120;1;331:120;2;205:120;3;360:120;4;297:120;5;431:120;6;1306 > 2014;04;05:09;55;13:120;1;331:120;2;205:120;3;360:120;4;297:120;5;431:120;6;1306 > 2014;04;05:09;56;25:120;1;331:120;2;204:120;3;360:120;4;296:120;5;431:120;6;1306 > 2014;04;05:09;56;30:120;1;331:120;2;205:120;3;360:120;4;296:120;5;430:120;6;1306 > 2014;04;05:09;56;34:120;1;331:120;2;205:120;3;360:120;4;296:120;5;430:120;6;1306 Updates are okay until 09:55:13, then there's a gap, then the next update is 09:56:25. Given your step and heartbeat settings, I think this should result in: the interval from 09:55:10 to 09:55:15 is defined, as more than half of it has known data. the interval from 09:55:15 to 09:55:20, as well as from 09:55:20 to 09:55:25, is undefined because of the heartbeat setting. It should contain "NaN" or similar. 09:55:25 to 09:55:30 has data again. Please check this by dumping your database (rrdtool dump) and examining the file. Also please verify that RRDtool does indeed get its input exactly corresponding to what you just showed here. By that I mean that the timestamp is computed from those numbers, and no extra updates happen (e.g. for the missing update at 09:56:20, inserting zeros). If this is all well, there could also be an issue when graphing. Are you using STACK somehow? I ask because there seems to be no immediate relation between the numbers you show as rates, and the graph. Also the anomalies have the same shape, with different positions on the Y-axis. _______________________________________________ rrd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
