Hello Aleksandr,
What you tell is very detailed. I don't know what is happening to your
graph. I don't know if this will help you. But remember that rrdtool
don't stores real data. I mean that maybe rrdtool is interpolating and
that's why the graph is not as exactly as you think it should be.
bye

2011/4/27 Aleksandr Pasechnik <aleksandr.pasech...@gmail.com>:
> Hello all!
>
> I have an rrd collecting meteorological data. It has a step of 300 seconds 
> and data is fairly reliably entered every 150 seconds. There are times when 
> my computer is off and no data is entered. Explicit U's would be entered if 
> there was a problem getting the data, but I haven't encountered that yet. The 
> strange thing is that I have been getting these big, unexplained jumps in the 
> graphs (with corresponding strange numbers in the rrd dump) after blank 
> periods. The parameter in question (it happens to the others sometimes, but 
> for some reason this last time it only manifested in this one) is the 
> atmospheric pressure. It is stored as a GAUGE with a heartbeat of 600, a min 
> of 0 and a max of U. I've got some RRA's, namely Average, Min, and Max at xff 
> 0.1, 1 data point, and 7340 rows (30 days of data i think); and xff 0.5, 12 
> data points, and 44040 rows (5 years of data). I'm currently plotting the 
> last 24 hours of data with a resolution of one pixel per data point. Before 
> the blan
>  k occurred, my script was writing 1015.8 into the pressure. Once the 
> computer came back up, it was entering 1012.8 and 1012.4 (a bit of sensor 
> noise between measurements i suppose). At no point did i write a 1008.9 or 
> whatever its plotting there. Here is the offending graph output:
>
> http://russkey.tumblr.com/post/4971101013/jumping-rrdtool
>
> Any thoughts why this is happening? Anything I can do to stop it? I thought 
> it might have something to do with the xff, so i changed it from 0.5 to 0.1 
> for the 1 data point per row RRA's but that doesn't seem to have helped. 
> Though now that I think about it, perhaps it would make more sense to have 
> just a single RRA for the 1 data point per row section, and have it a Last 
> instead of an Average? Any help at all would be appreciated!
>
> Al
> _______________________________________________
> rrd-users mailing list
> rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
> https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users
>

_______________________________________________
rrd-users mailing list
rrd-users@lists.oetiker.ch
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/rrd-users

Reply via email to