Hi Eric, I think, it might be good for you to read the tutorials and manuals about rrdtool. But anyways, what do you want to achieve? Showing everything allright when there are NaN's? It is not very nice to say: "Okay, if I don't know what happened, probably everything was allright.".
But ok, there is one line that defines Cleaned: CDEF:Cleaned=Response,UN,0.0,Response,IF This line sets all NaN to 0.0, insert whatever you want instead of the 0.0. Cheers, Stephan Eric Brander wrote: >It works very well, except that since this is a new setup, the >historical graphs have little data and the SLA line takes the NANs as >failures. Again, I've taken this from someone else's example and I must >admit that I really don't understand exactly what those statements mean. > >My question to you: Is there a way I can build the SLA line without it >incorporating NANs or Unknowns in to its equation? > > > -- Stephan Harren Head of Engineering AboveNet Deutschland GmbH ------------------------- Phone +49 69 90554 153 Fax +49 69 90554 111 Cell +49 173 7011126 -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
