Today MacLeod, Jase A. wrote: > Dan, > > I attempted the same thing as you did. > I currently run 1.0.33 but was testing 1.0.40. > > With 1.0.33 I dumped an rrd and restored with the following results... > dumped test.rrd (502,524 bytes) -> test1.xml (1,607,865 bytes) > restore test1.xml -> test1.rrd (502,524 bytes) > dumped test1.rrd -> test2.xml (1,607,865 bytes) > restore test2.xml -> test2.rrd (502,524 bytes) > etc etc.. > > With 1.0.40 I dumped an rrd and restores with the following results... > dumped test.rrd (502,524 bytes) -> test1.xml (1,607,865 bytes) > restore test1.xml -> test1.rrd (502,621 bytes) > dumped test1.rrd -> test2.xml (1,890,564 bytes) > restore test2.xml -> test2.rrd (503,333 bytes) > > Thus it appears to be a problem with the restore command due to the > first dump having the exact same byte count. >
Hi Jase, How about using rrdtool 1.0.45 ? You caould run diff -u on the two xml files to see what the difference is gruss tobi -- ______ __ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker @ ISG.EE, ETZ J97, ETH, CH-8092 Zurich / // _ \/ _ \/ / System Manager, Time Lord, Coder, Designer, Coach /_/ \.__/_.__/_/ http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker +41(0)1-632-5286 -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
