On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:19:03PM -0400, Sebastian Castro wrote:
> When I kill the program, for those intervals I haven't put data, the
> graph show them as a veru high value. Por example, if I've got samples
> around 200 each time, for the period where there is no data, the graph
> shows values near to 6M or more.
Most likely no, the problem does not occur when you stop your program.
It will occur when you restart it. You are telling rrdtool the current
value is 0 (or some other small number) and this is just another case
of the counter-reset-which-is-detected-as-a-counter-wrap.
> How can avoid this behaviour?
RRDtool does this:
if (current_value < last_value)
then
assume current_value is 2^32 larger
fi
This has been discussed many times. You should be able to find it in
the archives of this list.
1) do not tell rrdtool any rate is a proper rate ("U"nlimited maximum)
2) use derive in stead of counter, and set the minimum allowed rate to 0
3) make sure your front end tells rrdtool the current rate is unknown at
startup. You do not know anything about the past so you cannot enter
a value as the current rate
--
Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give
offence. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit
communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about
solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy.
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
